Our Twitter feed!
Each gram of cellular glycogen is stored with 2.7 gram of water.
Quote from: Tarlach on March 03, 2010, 07:05:42 PMEach gram of cellular glycogen is stored with 2.7 gram of water.Ahh so its that simple?Would eating loads of carbs to store more water help you survive if you had to walk across a desert with no supplies?
Quote from: samjohn on March 03, 2010, 08:51:58 PMQuote from: Tarlach on March 03, 2010, 07:05:42 PMEach gram of cellular glycogen is stored with 2.7 gram of water.Ahh so its that simple?Would eating loads of carbs to store more water help you survive if you had to walk across a desert with no supplies?Having your glycogen storage filled will definitely help you in that situation, and not only because of the water.
Quote from: ajmesa on March 03, 2010, 10:46:36 PMQuote from: samjohn on March 03, 2010, 08:51:58 PMQuote from: Tarlach on March 03, 2010, 07:05:42 PMEach gram of cellular glycogen is stored with 2.7 gram of water.Ahh so its that simple?Would eating loads of carbs to store more water help you survive if you had to walk across a desert with no supplies?Having your glycogen storage filled will definitely help you in that situation, and not only because of the water. ... except you would be starving hungry in a couple of hours and then want to go to sleep when you couldn't get any carbs.
There's an obvious survival advantage to having glycogen storage filled, our ancestors had this advantage and as far as I am aware they were not carb junkies.
Glycogen stores can be filled without carbs, but you have smaller stores without dietary carbs.
Quote from: ajmesa on March 04, 2010, 09:11:47 AMThere's an obvious survival advantage to having glycogen storage filled, our ancestors had this advantage and as far as I am aware they were not carb junkies.There's also an obvious survival disadvantage to having large amounts of glycogen stored, namely carrying around ten extra pounds.
The quality of arguments in this forum is becoming really low. I mean, really, debating whether having a filled glycogen storage is beneficial in the wild? Ridiculous. Pathetic. To me this just shows the type of arguments that the extreme-low-carb people have to hold on to in order for the real world not to break their little glass bubble. I have nothing against low carb (great for weight loss, poor for performance), but these kind of arguments don't help anyone. Paleo is not even supposed to be a low carb diet, the concept has nothing to do with the macro-nutrient ratio.Have fun with the stupid arguments. I refuse to posts in these type of threads anymore.