We now have a wiki!
Quote from: phrakture on July 22, 2010, 08:43:23 AMThese women are raised in a society where being physically desired is one of the best things they can have in life. You can't just point at an individual and say "change!". You have to change the social mores.I disagree completely. Wanting to be the most attractive member of your gender is not a result of civilization or agriculture or society, but rather an instinctive drive to pass on your genes in the best possible way. For men, it means being attractive to as many women as possible (quantity), and for women (quality), it means being the most attractive to the most desireable man/men.Being attractive for women is quite straightforward and has not been significantly affected by Cosmo, Fashion models or any of the other "societal evil" or alleged brainwasher. Being attractive is a proxy for being fertile and can be summed up as:- Be young (fertility decreases a LOT after 30).- Have a .7 hips to waist ratio (or as close as possible).- Look generally healthy (eg: full lips, no acne, good skin, etc.)- Be reasonably sane.Other factors that women may consider should make them attractive, such as their career, experience, personality, knowledge, prizes, etc., won't necessarily make them more attractive to all men. Some may appreciate these factors, but not all.What agricultural civilizations create, by virtue of size, is a much bigger peer group. So the women who have an instinct to be desireable to the top men in a group of 100-150 people are all of a sudden driven to compete with their 10 million peers in a region. Most of them cope well, but a few end up with problems / wrong decisions such as anorexia, too much surgery, etc.
These women are raised in a society where being physically desired is one of the best things they can have in life. You can't just point at an individual and say "change!". You have to change the social mores.
Quote from: ARod on July 22, 2010, 01:50:49 PMEvery society has their own stereotypical ideal for a woman's body, and in America's case, this ideal is currently in the hands of the media, which likes to portray terribly thin frames with moderate curves as the ideal. her body has been shaped by olympic competition, not by the media.
Every society has their own stereotypical ideal for a woman's body, and in America's case, this ideal is currently in the hands of the media, which likes to portray terribly thin frames with moderate curves as the ideal.
Quote from: ARod on July 22, 2010, 01:50:49 PMEvery society has their own stereotypical ideal for a woman's body, and in America's case, this ideal is currently in the hands of the media, which likes to portray terribly thin frames with moderate curves as the ideal.Can you describe how that media portrayed ideal differs from Marilou Dozois, as pictured in Phrakture's post on the first page of this thread? It seems to me she's a pretty good example, but her body has been shaped by olympic competition, not by the media.
You're right. But in the media's eyes and to most women she would be considered "too muscley" and "thick". I find it quit attractive but that's me. If you asked a random person off the street they would most likely think the opposite.
I am not doubting anyone's opinion on here, I'm giving it to you from a females perspective. You may think a gals muscular legs look freaking fantastic but she, the owner of those legs, may hate them b/c they are too muscular to abide by societies standards of what "sexy legs" look like.
That would mean that even if someone were to objectively have the body of one ideal, she may still be dissatisfied with her body because it does not match up to the other.
I have zero sympathy for all this 'the media gave me an eating disorder' idiocy. It is passing the buck just as surely as is suing Mcdonald's for being fat because you stuffed your face with burgers.That said, these magazines have to go. In Australia Dolly and Cosmo both have an audience which contains a large percentage of 12-14 year old girls yet regularly feature very sexually explicit articles. With regards to body type, it is personal choice. If you want to be muscly, be muscly, just be aware there are people it will appeal to and people it will not appeal to. There is no 'Ideal female body'.
not every woman can be an olympic athlete, but you are correct in suggesting that an active and healthy lifestyle is one practical method of lessening body dissatisfaction among men and women alike. Every society has an ideal that is considered by the society to be healthy and attractive. Ours can sometimes be reached through firm commitment to diet and exercise, but most women will never match up to the ideal (even those who fight to become thin often lack the curves).